Zillow’s Listing Criteria: Transparency and IDX Rules

When Zillow flags a listing that violates its criteria, it won’t show up on Zillow– at least, not as long as the vendor’s brokerage contract stands. “If the listing were to expire and the home was relisted at a different brokerage, then that kind of resets points, which listing would be permitted to be showed on Zillow,” Samuelson said.

Transparency and NAR’s Role

Much more transparency, less threat: NAR’s choice on CCP “verifies the point” that openness is vital for vendors and customers, Samuelson stated. The fact that sellers that go with postponed advertising needs to sign a disclosure additionally “made it truly clear that there is some danger to vendors,” he added, mentioning Zillow and Bright MLS researches that have suggested off-MLS listings normally take longer to offer, and may sell for less.

Impact on Exclusive Broker Networks

“Truly, the only listings that would get impacted by this are listings initially in a broker’s exclusive network. That broker is around marketing those listings to some buyers– yet hasn’t put those listings in the MLS, hasn’t shared those listings with various other representatives, other brokerage firms– and afterwards later on makes a decision, ‘Well, oops, that didn’t function. Now we’re mosting likely to place it in the MLS,'” Samuelson discussed.

IDX Rules and Discrimination

“The trick under IDX is, it needs to be objective criteria, and you can not discriminate,” he said. “If I claimed, ‘I’m not mosting likely to reveal listings from broker agent A, but I will show listings from brokerage firm B,’ that’s a clear infraction of IDX rules.”

The method, which Samuelson said reasons “consumer damage,” is “basically bad” for the market. “As soon as one brokerage does this, it’s just a matter of time till various other brokerage firms feel pressured to do the exact same thing.”

“Delayed advertising and marketing or coming quickly listings are likewise not impacted by the listing criteria, so long as primary, they’re in the MLS, and number two, they’re readily available for public display,” he described.

Legality and Competitive Concerns

But is it lawful? Compass CEO Robert Reffkin has actually been among Zillow’s loudest movie critics, accusing the firm of “bully behavior” and recommending the brand-new listing requirements are anticompetitive and “an abuse of syndicate power.” Samuelson differs.

Editor’s note: The Real Estate Experts Unfiltered podcast explores the people and pressures that shape the realty market. Check out our top takeaways and view the current episode from NextHome co-CEOs James Dwiggins and Keith Robinson.

Privacy Considerations

“Actually, the only listings that would get influenced by this are listings originally in a broker’s personal network. That broker is out there marketing those listings to some buyers– yet hasn’t place those listings in the MLS, hasn’t shared those listings with other agents, other broker agents– and after that later chooses, ‘Well, oops, that really did not work. Samuelson states Zillow’s new requirements don’t do that. “It doesn’t matter what brokerage you’re with; this is our standards for which listings we’re going to show.

Respecting personal privacy, or double-ending offers? There are “legitimate factors” for some vendors– such as celebrities or other public figures– to note privately, and Zillow is great with those circumstances, Samuelson said.

Samuelson states Zillow’s brand-new requirements do not do that. “No matter what brokerage you’re with; this is our criteria for which listings we’re mosting likely to show. And that is entirely allowable under IDX.”