Compass Sued Over ‘do Not Call’ Violations

While Murch affirms she advised the Realtor “not to call her, however rather to email the pertinent info for her to assess if she was interested,” she later received “at least five text providing to detail the Plaintiff’s home, and to move,” according to the problem.

The Lawsuit Claims

What the claim claims: Jessica Murch, a local of Clackamas County, Oregon, submitted the grievance. Murch declares she was gotten in touch with multiple times on August 14, 2024, by a Real estate professional with Compass who asked if she wanted marketing her home, though she had not been a Compass customer and “never granted obtain phone calls or sms message from Compass.”

“The Plaintiff inevitably responded to those messages on August 29, 2024 stating, ‘Compass, do not call us or e-mail once again, I am sorry,'” the filing affirms, adding that call from other agents with Compass proceeded after Murch made a company-specific do not call request. Murch claims she most just recently received messages from a Compass agent on June 5 of this year.

National Do Not Call Registry

The lawsuit versus Compass was filed in the U.S. Area Court for the Area of Oregon, Rose City Department, on June 17. It alleges that Compass called a specific multiple times in 2024 and 2025 despite their number being detailed on the National Do Not Call Computer registry. The suit is looking for class action standing.

The purpose of the representatives’ contact was “to promote and to market” Compass’ services and “to solicit the Plaintiff to subscribe” for those services, the issue affirms, adding, “The calls therefore constituted unlawful outbound telemarketing.”

Proposed Classes & Damages

2 proposed classes might include hundreds: The suit recommends 2 courses for the match, one national and one inner. The nationwide class would certainly consist of individuals whose numbers are listed on the National Do Not Call Computer system registry yet that still got greater than one advertising telephone call from Compass in a 12-month period over the last four years.

Murch is seeking approximately $500 per alleged TCPA offense for both classes, plus “approximately $1,500 in damages if the telephone calls are discovered to be willful” for those who get the internal class. The combined course size is “thought to be at the very least thousands of persons currently,” the filing states.

The inner class would include individuals that obtained 2 or more marketing hires the last four years despite the fact that they “were not current clients of the Offenders at the time of the calls” and “had actually formerly requested for the calls to quit,” according to the problem.